Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:12
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do British people always write "xxx" after their names?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Cum at omnis doloremque totam.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Would deporting illegal aliens alleviate the housing crisis?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What do men like to be given for their birthday?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
NASA spacecraft captures image of Japanese lander crash site on moon - KIRO 7 News Seattle
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.